ChatGPT能通过考试？超新AI已站在作者署名边缘?

这篇文章发表在medRxiv，这是一个医学、临床和相关的健康科学领域的开放获取的预印本资料库。所谓的预印本，就是未定稿本。在学术出版领域，预印本是指尚未在需要同行评审的科学期刊上出版的科学文献的草稿。

说白了就是一篇草稿，名字叫《Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-Assisted Medical Education Using Large Language Models》[1]。

翻译过来就是《ChatGPT 在 USMLE 上的表现：使用大型语言模型进行 AI 辅助医学教育的潜力》，USMLE全称：United States Medical Licensing Examination，美国执业医师资格考试，是所有医学生成为美国临床执业的路径。

说白了就是将ChatGPT作为AI考生，看看能不能通过这个考试。

🏆 ChatGPT Shines: Unmatched Performance in All Three Exams Without Extra Help 🚀After a comprehensive analysis, it’s evident that ChatGPT has outperformed expectations and reached a remarkable level of proficiency across the board. Its impressive performance in the exams, without any specialized training or reinforcement, solidifies its position as a game-changer in the realm of artificial intelligence education. 💪ChatGPT’s ability to excel in these assessments highlights its adaptability and versatility, demonstrating its potential to be a valuable tool for students seeking self-paced learning. Its effectiveness underscores the power of AI-driven education, proving that even without traditional coaching, top results can be achieved. 📚💻In today’s digital age, where technology is rapidly advancing, ChatGPT’s performance serves as a testament to the potential it holds in revolutionizing assessment and learning methods. It’s clear that this cutting-edge tool has the capability to bridge the gap between traditional education and personalized learning experiences. 🌠So, let’s celebrate this remarkable achievement and look forward to seeing how ChatGPT continues to shape the future of educational technology. #ChatGPTSuccess #AIInEducation

就是可以通过，这还是没有专门训练过和强化领域知识的前提下。

至于能不能加作者名字，这个当然可以。

所谓的署名权就是：Academic authorship (学术署名)，按理说只有对于文章有贡献就可以获得署名权，具体的也分领域和期刊等等[2]。

🌟了解了！当我们探讨学术研究背后的工作分配时，不妨参考”CRediT author statement”这一权威工具——Contributor Roles Taxonomy，它清晰定义了各种贡献者的角色和责任，为知识的构建提供了坚实框架。👩‍🏫学者们可以通过这个标准来明确自己的贡献，同时提升文献的透明度和认可度。SEO优化提示：#CRediT #学术研究 #贡献者角色

细分了这么多，比如ChatGPT肯定是提供了Software这一项，因为人家就已经提供了现成的软件接口，其余的贡献我不太敢确定，但或许也有涉猎。

最后，合情合理，这就是在ChatGPT上做的实验，其中ChatGPT做了很多贡献，获得署名权合理。

参考