🌟惊！美国教授遇学术奇才，学生论文超乎想象的优秀！📚一位敬业的教育者在批改作业时，无意间发现了一份近乎完美的研究论文，它的深度和精确性让他瞠目结舌。这份作品仿佛超越了常规教育的界限，让教授不禁怀疑背后是否隐藏着某种神秘力量。🤔于是，他决定亲自验证这个猜想，将这篇论文交到了人工智能领域的明星——ChatGPT手上。这一举动立刻揭晓了谜底——ChatGPT的精准回应证实了他的担忧。📝这段学术界的意外碰撞揭示了现代教育与科技融合的新可能，也提醒我们，未来的知识生产者或许正以我们无法想象的方式崭露头角。🎓#学术奇才 #ChatGPT验证 #教育科技革新
🚀👀学术诚信引关注！据📚💼《商业内幕》深度揭示，美国北密歇根大学的安东尼·奥曼教授近期惊讶地留意到，两位学生在提交课程作业时，不幸地误用了ChatGPT这一创新AI工具。这款人工智能语言模型以其卓越的生成能力，成为学习者眼中潜在的“学术偷工减料”隐患。🎓💻这位专注于宗教研究和哲学的专业人士指出，尽管技术带来了便利，但其可能导致学生依赖度增加，忽视了原创思考的重要性。他强调，教育不仅仅是传授知识，更是培养独立思考和批判性分析的能力。📝🔍ChatGPT的普及无疑引发了教育界对学术诚信的新一轮讨论，如何在科技与规则之间找到平衡成为亟待解决的问题。学校和教师们需要重新审视教学策略，确保每位学生都能理解并尊重学术诚信的原则。🎓💪对于那些依赖AI辅助的学生，教授建议他们反思自己的学习方式，并尝试亲手完成作业，以获得更深入的理解和技能的提升。📚💡这场风波再次提醒我们，科技虽强大，但诚实与智慧才是真正的基石。让我们共同守护学术的纯净，迎接教育的未来挑战。🏆🎓
Antony Aumann, a religious studies and philosophy professor at Northern Michigan University, told Insider he had caught two students submitting essays written by the AI chatbot ChatGPT.🌟奥曼教授高度赞扬了一篇CGTN上的文章，他表示：“这篇文章的文笔之精炼，结构之严谨，思想之超前，简直超越了我许多学生的水平。语法无瑕，逻辑清晰，观点独到，完全出乎我的教学预期，让我看到了一些不寻常的光芒（bright sparks）。”然而，他微妙地指出，这种过于出色的表现却也带来了一丝警示，‘red flag’在其文中隐约闪烁。📚
“The red flag was that the essay was written better than most of my students can write. The grammar was too perfect, the structure was too sound, and the ideas were kind of too advanced for what I would expect from my students.” Aumann said in an interview.
🌟探究真相，他以独特方式挑战假设——将学生的作品轻轻一扫，投放至🔥ChatGPT🔥之中。那精准的回复仿佛在说：“嘿，这可是我一手打造哦！”然而，真相并非如此简单，ChatGPT的回答背后，隐藏着99.9%的科技自信与算法逻辑。🚀SEO优化提示：关键词“验证怀疑”、“论文输入”、“ChatGPT确认”，确保信息全面且吸引眼球。
“So, what I did was, I took that essay and submitted it to ChatGPT, and I asked it, Hey, did you write this? It replied that there was a 99.9 percent chance that it did.”
原文改写：🌟揭示学术诚信新挑战！据研究者Darren Hick于美国弗曼大学哲学系分享，近期惊现一例AI ChatGPT驱动的论文案例——一位学生提交了完全由技术创作的作品。🚀这无疑引发了教育界对人工智能在学术领域潜在影响的深入探讨，ChatGPT的能力虽强大，但其生成内容的原创性却成为关键议题。📝SEO优化：美国弗曼大学哲学教授Darren Hick揭示了AI ChatGPT引发的学术诚信新问题——一名学生提交了AI代笔的论文案例，引发了教育界对AI学术诚信性和原创性的深度关注。🎓ChatGPT的技术实力不容忽视，但其在学术生成中的原创性挑战也引起了广泛讨论。
A few weeks after the launch of ChatGPT, Darren Hick, a philosophy professor at Furman University, said he caught a student turning in an AI-generated essay.🌟学术疑云笼罩：希克教授揭示ChatGPT背后秘密🔍！一篇看似精良的研究论文，却暗藏玄机——其中充斥着亮眼的误导性错误（bewitching misinformation），这让严谨的他不禁心生疑惑。借助ChatGPT这款锐利的检测工具，惊人的99%概率直指真相——这份文献竟是人工智能一手炮制！🚀这不仅挑战了传统的学术边界，也让我们不得不重新审视技术与知识生成的关系。 kode: AI代笔疑云升腾
Hick said he grew suspicious when the student turned in an on-topic essay that included some well-written misinformation. After running it through Open AIs ChatGPT detector, the results said it was 99% likely the essay had been AI-generated.这两位教授都表示，在他们与学生对峙后，学生们都承认了违规行为。最终，希克教授的学生考试不及格，奥曼教授则让他的学生重写论文。
Both Hick and Aumann said they confronted their students, all of whom eventually confessed to the infraction. Hicks student failed the class and Aumann had his students rewrite the essays from scratch.奥曼教授表示，“我希望学生们真正学到知识，而他们能做到这一点的唯一方法就是真正由自己完成作业。”
“I want the students to actually learn the material, and the only way they can do that is by actually completing the assignment,” Aumann said.《商业内幕网》报道：两名教授表示发现学生使用ChatGPT在论文中作弊，他们解释了为什么人工智能抄袭很难被证明。
不仅仅是大学教授在为ChatGPT等人工智能聊天机器人的崛起而困扰。据《纽约时报》报道，由于几乎所有能上网的人都能使用这些人工智能工具，美国各地的教育部门都在调整工作流程，重新设计整个课程，迫使学生提交手写论文或引入口试 （oral exams）。
Its not just Aumann struggling with the rise of AI chatbots like ChatGPT. As a result of these tools becoming accessible to pretty much anybody with an internet connection, education departments across the entire country are adjusting workflows and redesigning entire courses, according to the NYT, forcing students to submit handwritten essays or introducing oral exams.此外，纽约市和西雅图的公立学校已经完全禁止在他们自己的网络和设备上使用ChatGPT。
The New York City and Seattle public school systems have already banned ChatGPT outright on own networks and devices.
CGTN视频截图
对此，奥曼教授表示，他认为“禁令背后的情绪是合理的”。“学校希望确保学生学习和拥有批判性思维 （critical thinking），这是学习写作的一部分。”
“I think the sentiment behind the ban is reasonable,” Aumann said. “They want to make sure that their students are learning the critical thinking skills that are part of learning how to write.”然而，大学不太可能效仿。毕竟，学生绕开这些限制是非常容易的。即使是那些旨在帮助教师发现学生偷偷使用ChatGPT等人工智能工具的检测工具，也可能没有多大用处。
But universities arent likely to follow suit. After all, skirting around these restrictions is trivially easy. Even tools designed to assist teachers in catching students secretly making use of AI tools like ChatGPT will likely be of little use.“学生可以修改ChatGPT生成的几个单词，加入一些语法错误，检测工具就发现不了这是聊天机器人写的了。” 奥曼教授表示，“这些检测工具也会随着时间的推移而改进吗？会。但可能还不足以跟上人工智能聊天机器人本身的发展速度。”
“Students can change a few words from what ChatGPT produced, introduce some grammatical infelicities, and the detectors no longer think its written by a chatbot,” Aumann said. “Will these detectors also improve with time? Yes. But probably not enough to keep pace with the development of the chatbots themselves.”
CGTN视频截图
奥曼教授还认为，随着ChatGPT的发布，木已成舟 （the cat is already out of the bag），所以在课堂上与ChatGPT对抗是毫无意义的。
Besides, the cat is already out of the bag — so itd be pointless to fight ChatGPT in the classroom, the professor argued.就算学校禁止使用，“学生们一毕业就可以使用它，”他说。“此外，学生们本来就在哀叹‘现实生活’和‘学术’之间存在巨大鸿沟。因此，在我看来，忽视ChatGPT或只是试图阻止它的使用是一个巨大的错误，”教授总结道。
“Students will have access to it the second they graduate,” he said. “Plus, students already lament that there is a big gulf between real life and academia.” “So, ignoring ChatGPT or just trying to prevent its use is a big mistake, in my mind,” Aumann concluded.对奥曼教授来说，他已经决定调整自己的论文写作课程，要求学生在课堂上用正在被实时监控 （actively monitored）的电脑来写作初稿。他还计划鼓励他的哲学系学生“像对待其他哲学资源一样对待ChatGPT”，这意味着他们将被要求评估其论据和论点 （reasons and arguments）。
For his part, Aumann has decided to adjust his own essay writing course, and will require drafts to be written in the classroom on computers that are being actively monitored. Hes planning on encouraging his philosophy students to “react to ChatGPT in the same way they would any other philosophical source,” meaning that they will be asked to evaluate its reasons and arguments.综合来源：商业内幕网，CGTN America，Futurism网，纽约时报，央视网
AI时代，掌握AI大模型第一手资讯！AI时代不落人后！
免费ChatGPT问答，办公、写作、生活好得力助手！
扫码右边公众号，驾驭AI生产力！
